Israel Palestine Infos
Uri Avnery
August 25, 2012
The Fountainhead
I WAS not interested in Paul Ryan, the man about to be nominated by the
Republican party for the office of Vice President, until the name Ayn Rand
popped up.
Ayn Rand, it was said, was one of the main inspirations for his particular
philosophy. Since Ryan is being represented not as an ordinary, run-of-the-mill
politician, like Mitt Romney, but as a profound political and economic thinker,
the inspiration deserves some scrutiny.
LIKE MOST people in this country, Ayn Rand first entered my life as the author
of The Fountainhead, a novel that came out four years before the birth of
the State of
It is the story of an architect of genius (roughly similar to Frank Lloyd
Wright) who follows his own individual style and disdains the tastes of the
masses. When his architectural design for a housing project is altered by the
builders, he blows the buildings up, defending his actions in court in a
stirring speech in defense of individualism.
(Honest disclosure: I have often dreamed of doing the same to certain buildings
in Tel Aviv, especially the luxury hotels built between my home and the sea.)
I started to read her second bestseller, Atlas Shrugged, in which
she set out her philosophy in detail. But I must confess, to my eternal shame,
that I never finished it. It bored me.
ONE DAY IN 1974, my friend Dan Ben-Amotz called me and demanded that I
immediately meet a young genius he had discovered called Dr. Moshe Kroy.
Ben-Amotz was a character by himself. A man of my age, he was at the time
He brought Kroy to my home and I was impressed. Here was an unusually erudite
24-year-old youngster, already a lecturer at
It appeared that he was a True Believer in the teachings of Ayn Rand, which she
called Objectivism. This proclaimed that egoism was the basic duty of every
human being. Any kind of social commitment was a sin against nature. Only by
serving his own interest and cleansing himself of any trace of altruism can a
person truly fulfill himself. Society at large can progress only when it is
based on such individuals, each one striving to serve only himself (or herself).
Such an outlook can be hugely attractive to a certain kind of individual. It
provides them with a philosophical justification for the extreme exercise of
egoism, not giving a damn for anyone else.
Kroy, and of course Ben-Amotz, were religiously devoted to this new creed. (This
is, of course, an oxymoron, since Ayn Rand was a total unbeliever, condemning
any form of religion, including the Jewish religion of her parents.) When I
caught Ben-Amotz doing something which could be construed as beneficial to
others, he went to great lengths in justifying it by proving that in the long
run it was to his own ultimate advantage.
Kroy himself was obviously a very disturbed being. At the age of 41, he
committed suicide. I was not certain whether Ayn Rand disturbed his mind or
whether he was attracted to her because he was disturbed to start with.
AYN RAND was born as Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum in Saint Petersburg, which later
became Petrograd, which later became
She adopted the name of Ayn (rhymes with “swine”, as she herself was wont to
explain). She probably took the word from the Hebrew, where it means “eye”. The
surname
Her early history may in some measure explain her abiding hatred for Communism
and any kind of collectivism, including social democracy, as well as any kind of
religion or statism. For her, the state was the enemy of the free individual.
This led her naturally to embrace an unbridled laissez faire capitalism
(what Shimon Peres called “swinish capitalism”) and to reject any form of
welfare state or safety net.
All this was well structured in her philosophy, which was adopted by believers
all over the world. She once called herself “the most creative thinker alive”.
On another occasion, she asserted that in all the annals of philosophy, there
were only three great thinkers, all starting with an A: Aristotle, Aquinas and
Ayn Rand.
She must have been an unabashed racist, too: during the 1973 Yom Kippur War she
said that it was “civilized men fighting savages”, comparing Israelis to the
White Americans fighting the Red Indians.
No wonder that she posthumously became the darling of the Tea Party fanatics who
are now dominating the Republican Party. And no wonder that Paul Ryan proudly
cites her as one of his most important mentors. (Ayn Rand herself died in 1982
at age 77. Her funeral was attended by her devotees, including Alan Greenspan,
one of the gravediggers of the
There is something in the teachings of this Jewish White Russian preacher of
extreme egoism that appeals to the primitive American myths of rugged
individualism, gun-toting Wild West self-reliance, suspicion of the
domination-hungry state (going back to King George the Third). But this is not
the 18th century, for God’s sake.
I NEVER studied philosophy, though on my path I have picked up a few dozen books
about it here and there. But Ayn Rand’s theories always struck me as, well,
juvenile.
There is a picture in my mind. The late Israeli writer Pinchas Sadeh described
how once, as an adolescent, he had climbed a ladder in the library of his
kibbutz, taken out a book of Nietzsche's and stood there, at the top of the
ladder, for several hours, unable to stop reading. It was, I suppose, Thus
Spoke Zarathustra, a dangerous book for young people. It also had a huge
impact on Ayn Rand in her younger years.
Nietzsche castigates the “Jewish pity morality”, which has infected the adorable
“blond beasts”. Compassion for the weak is a sin, because it blunts the
capabilities of the strong, those on the way to becoming supermen. Which young
person does not see themself as a potential superman (or, I suppose,
superwoman)?
When Dan Ben-Amotz tried to convince me of the “rational egoism” of Ayn Rand, I
countered with a simple argument: when I was wounded in 1948 and lay completed
exposed to enemy fire, four soldiers of my squad came up and rescued me, risking
their lives. Their egoism must have told them that this was an extremely silly
thing to do. Risking their most precious possession – their very lives – for
another human being was inexcusable according to Ayn Rand. They had nothing to
gain from it. They had everything to lose.
I have seen in my life innumerable acts of altruism, large and small. Indeed,
what is love, real love, but a pure form of altruism?
Sure, every person is, to some extent, an egoist. But every person is also, to
some extent, an altruist. Human beings are social animals, their social
instincts deeply imbedded in their nature. Without them, human society could not
function.
I TOO was captured by Nietzsche in my youth. But “Jewish pity morality” won.
That’s why I, like many Israelis, cannot even begin to understand American
social attitudes, as illustrated yet again in the present election campaign.
For us it is self-evident that the state has a duty to help the sick, the old,
the children, the handicapped and the disadvantaged. An ancient saying goes “
Binyamin Netanyahu is an American-style Republican, a strong supporter of Mitt
Romney. He has done incalculable damage to the Israeli social net, both as
Finance Minister and as Prime Minister. But not even he would advertise himself
as a disciple of Ayn Rand. He has,
however, one thing in common with Paul Ryan: both are pushed forward and
financed by Sheldon Adelson.
I can think of no purer personification of Ayn Rand’s vision than this Casino
billionaire. She would have adored him. He is the perfect egoist. He has become
super-rich by exploiting the pitiful addiction of weak human beings. His
business practices have been questioned. Yet even here there is some room for
doubt: does Adelson spend hundreds of millions on people like Romney, Ryan and
Netanyahu only to further his own business interests? Or do we detect even here
a trace of altruism, a desire to fulfill his national and social visions,
objectionable as they may be?
SINCE AYN
Actually, I don’t believe in either the intellectual prowess or the political
honesty of the man. He looks to me slightly phoney. I am not sure that Ayn Rand
would have liked him either. If only Gary Cooper could play him, he
might look more convincing.