"WAR IS much too serious a thing to be left to military men," in Talleyrand's memorable words. In the same spirit, one could say: The American presidential elections are much too serious to be left to the Americans.
Unfortunately, the citizens of the world have no part in these elections. But they may, at least, voice an opinion.
Availing myself of this right I say: I am for Barack Obama.
FIRST OF ALL I must confess: my attitude towards the
Gradually, I lost my illusions. Joe McCarthy helped me along the way. I
learned that with depressing regularity, the
During the Vietnam War I took part in demonstrations. I happened to be in
Somehow I got on the CIA (or was it the FBI?) black list. I managed to obtain a visa only with great difficulty, and was struck forever from the list of invitees to the American embassy parties in Tel Aviv. I don't know if this happened because of those protests, or because of my friendship with Henri Curiel, a Jewish-Egyptian revolutionary who helped us in our contacts with the PLO. The Americans held him, quite mistakenly, to be a KGB agent.
At the same time, my name was struck by the Soviets from every list of
people invited from
My friend Afif Safieh,
now the chief PLO representative in the
In these terms, George Bush belongs to the first. Obama, his opposite in almost every respect, represents the second.
ONE CAN arrive at Obama by a process of elimination.
John McCain is a continuation of Bush. More attractive, probably more intelligent (which doesn't mean much). But he is more of the same. The same policy - a dangerous mix of intoxication with power and simple-mindedness. The same world of the Wild West myth, of Good Guys (Americans and their stooges) and Bad Guys (everybody else). A macho world of sham masculinity, where everything is seen through the sights of a gun.
McCain will go on with the wars, and may start new ones. His economic
agenda is the same "swinish capitalism" (Shimon Peres' phrase), which
has now brought disaster on the economy of the
Eight years of Bush are enough for us. Thank you.
Hillary? True, there is something very positive in the fact that a woman is a potential candidate for the leadership of the most powerful country in the world. As the old Jewish blessing has it: Blessed art thou, the Lord, our God, who let us live to see this day. I believe that the feminist revolution was by far the most important one of the 20th Century, since it overturns the social patterns of thousands of years, and perhaps also the biological patterns of million of years. This revolution is still going on, and the election of a woman president would be a milestone.
But it is not enough that it be a woman. It is also important which woman it is.
I spent some years struggling against Golda Meir, the worst Prime
The usual explanation is that in order to prevail in a man's world, a
woman politician has to prove that she is at least as tough as the men are.
When she comes to power, she wants to show that she, too, can make war and
command armies. Hillary has already acted tough by voting for the disastrous
(Years ago, when she came out for a Palestinian state, Gush Shalom demonstrated in her honor in front of the US embassy in Tel Aviv. We wanted to present her with a bunch of flowers. The embassy people treated us as enemies and refused to accept the flowers. Since then, Hillary has not uttered another word in favor of the Palestinians.)
I don't know how much she was a partner to her husband's decisions in the
White House. The President's wife may be closest to his ear - and the
President's husband will probably be closest to her ear. Anyhow, in the eight
years of Bill Clinton nothing good for Israeli-Palestinian peace happened. In
his "peace team" there were a lot of American Jews, but not a single
American Arab. He was totally subservient to the
Hillary is a run of the mill politician. If McCain is a continuation of
Bush, Hillary is an extension of the entire present American political system,
the present policy and the present routine. But the world needs another
THE NAME of another
The very fact that this person can be a serious contender for the
presidency at all restores my faith in the possibilities inherent in
The great message of Obama is Obama himself. A person who has roots in
three continents (and another half:
I am not as naïve as I sound. I realize that in his speeches there is more enthusiasm than content. We can't know what he will do once elected president. President Obama may disappoint us. But I prefer to take a risk with a man like this than to know in advance what the two routine politicians, his competitors, will do.
I am not overly impressed by election speeches. I have conducted four
election campaigns myself and I know that there are things one has to say and
things one must not say. It's all with limited liability. But beyond all the
speechifying, one fact is more important than a million words: Obama opposed
On the other hand, perhaps this very fact - more even than the color of his skin, his middle name and his "lack of experience" - will work against him. The voters do not like a person who was right when they were wrong. It's like admitting: he was wise and we were stupid. When a politician wants to be elected, he would be well advised to hide the fact that he was right.
A personal note: as an optimist from birth, I like Obama's optimism. I prefer a candidate who brings hope over one destroying hope. Optimism spurs to action, pessimism produces nothing but despair.
Can Obama do this? I hope so. I am not sure. But I am quite sure that the other two will not.
HERE A JEW will pop the classic question: Is it good for the Jews?
The people who claim to speak for the American Jews, the "leaders" who were not elected by anyone, the chiefs of the fetid "organizations", are conducting a dirty campaign of defamation and sly hints against him. If his middle name is Hussein and he is black, he must be an "Arab-lover". Also, he did not distance himself enough from the anti-Semite Louis Farakhan.
The same "leaders" are in bed with the most loathsome racists
IT MUST be asked: Is it good for
All three candidates have groveled at the feet of AIPAC. The fawning of
all three before the Israeli leadership is disgusting. They all show a lack of
integrity. But I know that they have no choice. That's how it is in the
In spite of this, Obama succeeded in getting out one courageous sentence.
Speaking before a mainly Jewish audience in
I hope that the American Barack (blessed, in Arabic), if elected, will not turn into a replica of the Israeli Barak (lightning, in Hebrew).
Real friendship means: when you see that your friend is drunk, you don't encourage him to drive. You offer to take him home. I am longing for an American president who will have the courage and the honesty to tell our leaders: Dear friends, you are drunk with power! You are speeding along a highway that leads to an abyss!
Perhaps Barack Obama will be such a friend. This would be a blessing for us, too.